A firm built across one of the most consequential borders in the world.
Feerstone was founded on the conviction that the institutions that most need AI capability are the ones most poorly served by public AI. Our answer was structural, not rhetorical.
Windsor and Detroit are separated by a river and joined by the busiest commercial crossing in North America. We built a firm in that shape on purpose.
Two entities. One Canadian, one United States. Separate contracting, separate infrastructure, separate jurisdictional posture. A client's workload is placed where the law requires it, by an entity that is itself subject to that law. The cross-border structure is not marketing. It is the operating model.
We believe that capability and control are not opposites. The institutions we work for, law firms, hospitals, defense suppliers, and banks, have been told for two years that they must choose. Feerstone exists to refuse that choice on their behalf.
Feerstone is named for two things. Stone, because stone stays put, the opposite of the cloud our clients are forbidden to use. And Feer, from the founder's family name, because he put his name on the firm and stands behind it.
An engineering bench drawn from regulated industries, not consumer tech.
Our team has shipped systems inside hospitals, inside law firms, and inside defense suppliers. We have stood in front of CISOs and general counsel. We have been told no, and we have learned why. That is the bench we bring to every engagement.
Canadian operations
Engagements with Canadian clients are contracted and delivered by our Canadian entity, with workloads kept inside Canadian jurisdiction by default.
United States operations
United States clients are contracted and delivered by our United States entity, including engagements that touch CMMC and federal compliance regimes.